Jennifer Rubin Newsletter
Sign-up to receive daily news on Jennifer Rubin by email.
Jennifer Rubin Filmography
Source:
Theiapolis
Jennifer Rubin Resources
DVD on Jennifer Rubin:
Jennifer Rubin Music:
 | Delusion (1991 Film)
Jim Metzler, Jennifer Rubin, Kyle Secor, Jerry Orbach, Kevin West, John W. Hart, Roxanne Thompson, Barbara Horan, Maria Gulezian and Seth Willenson
EDITION: Audio CD
MANUFACTURER: Fine Line UK
RELEASE DATE: 10 July, 1997 |
 |
| More Jennifer Rubin Music >> |
Books on Jennifer Rubin:
Latest Film News
Latest news on Jennifer Rubin
IssuesLevin, MacCallum falsely accused Obama of inconsistency on whether Iranian Revolutionary Guard should be designated a terrorist group
During
the June 4 edition of his nationally syndicated
radio show, Mark Levin falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama "lied
to" the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when he "told
them today that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards should be designated a
terrorist group after voting against a bill designating them a terrorist group
a year ago." Similarly, on the June 5 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk, anchor Martha MacCallum, referring
to "whether or not the Guard should be considered -- on the world stage
-- a terrorist organization," asserted that Obama "seems to be
changing his tune on the significant issue." In fact, Obama has
consistently supported designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist
organization, having co-sponsored a bill in 2007 to do that. Obama said he would have voted
against the bill Levin referenced -- the Kyl-Lieberman resolution -- because
it "states that our military presence in Iraq should be used to counter
Iran," not because the resolution expressed the sense of
the Senate that "the United States should designate Iran's Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps as a foreign terrorist organization."
Following
MacCallum's assertion on Live Desk that
Obama "seems to be changing his tune," Fox News blogger and
correspondent Griff Jenkins noted that Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor pointed out
that Obama "co-sponsored a bill that would designate the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization." Indeed, as The New York Times,
FactCheck.org, and
Obama's website all noted, Obama did co-sponsor a bill that expressed the sense of
the Congress that "[t]he Secretary of State should designate the Iranian
Revolutionary Guards as a Foreign Terrorist Organization."
Moreover,
Obama has not said that he would have voted against the Kyl-Lieberman
resolution because of its designation of the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist
organization. Rather, he has repeatedly criticized the resolution for including
a passage asserting "that the manner in which the United States
transitions and structures its military presence in Iraq will have critical
long-term consequences for the future of the Persian Gulf and the Middle East,
in particular with regard to the capability of the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Iran to pose a threat to the security of the region, the prospects
for democracy for the people of the region, and the health of the global
economy."
Indeed, shortly after the Kyl-Lieberman
resolution passed on September 26, 2007, Obama's office released a statement indicating
why he "would have opposed the Kyl-Lieberman amendment had he been able
to vote today." The statement did not mention the resolution's
provision declaring the Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization:
Senator Obama clearly recognizes the serious threat posed by Iran. However, he does not agree with
the President that the best way to counter that threat is to keep large numbers
of troops in Iraq, and he
does not think that now is the time for saber-rattling towards Iran.
In fact, he thinks that our large troop presence in Iraq
has served to strengthen Iran
-- not weaken it. He believes that diplomacy and economic pressure, such as the
divestment bill that he has proposed, is the right way to pressure the Iranian
regime. Accordingly, he would have opposed the Kyl-Lieberman amendment had he
been able to vote today.
On
November 1, 2007, Obama introduced a resolution
"[c]larifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the
Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq, any resolution
previously adopted, or any other provision of law." The next day,
Obama's Senate office released a statement
that the resolution would "undo damage caused
by Senate's passage of [the] Kyl-Lieberman amendment."
Neither the statement nor the resolution itself mentioned the Kyl-Lieberman
resolution's designation of the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization.
Rather, in the statement, Obama asserted that the Kyl-Lieberman amendment
"states that our military presence in Iraq
should be used to counter Iran"
and that along with the Iraq
war authorization, it "opened the door to an attack on Iran":
Yesterday
evening, U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) introduced Senate Joint Resolution
23, a legislative proposal specifying that the use of force against Iran
is not authorized by any previous action of Congress. This would include the
authorization of the use of force against Iraq;
the recently passed Kyl-Lieberman amendment,
which states that our military presence in Iraq
should be used to counter Iran;
and any resolution previously adopted by Congress.
"There is
absolutely no reason to trust that this Administration will not use existing
congressional authorization to justify military action against Iran,"
said Senator Obama. "The Iraq War authorization and the recently passed Kyl-Lieberman amendment have opened the door to
an attack on Iran,
and Congress must now shut that door. We need aggressive diplomacy and economic
pressure, which is why I support sanctions on Iran. Those efforts must not be
linked to the use of our military presence in Iraq and the region, because we
have seen what this Administration does when you trust them to do the right
thing but give them an opening to do the wrong thing."
Given concerns about the
Bush Administration's expansive view of executive authority, and the
likelihood that any attack on Iran
would come from our military presence already in Iraq
and the region, this resolution is necessary
to remove any suggestion that Kyl-Lieberman or any other existing provision of
law or resolution authorizes the President to attack Iran. Instead, the President will
have to get specific statutory authorization from the Congress to use force
against Iran.
In a December 4, 2007, Democratic
presidential debate, Obama similarly
said of the Kyl-Lieberman amendment:
OBAMA:
There was another problem with the resolution that we haven't spoken about, and
that was that it suggested that we should structure in some way our forces in Iraq with the goal of blunting Iranian influence
in Iraq.
Now,
this is a problem on a whole bunch of fronts, but number one, the reason that Iran has been strengthened was because of this
misguided war in Iraq.
We installed -- helped to elect a government in Iraq
that we knew had connections with Iran. And so the notion somehow
that they're not going to have influence and that we may be using yet another
justification for a continuing mission in Iraq I think is an extreme problem
and one of the reasons why this was a bad idea.
Levin and MacCallum's assertions
echoed Sen. John McCain's reported accusation during a June 4 blogger conference call
that Obama "switched" his position on the issue. The call was
transcribed by National Review Online blogger Jim Geraghty:
Jen Rubin [Commentary magazine blogger and
humanevents.com columnist]: What did you think of Obama saying he felt the
Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps should be designated a terrorist
organization, after voting against a bill to do that a few months ago?
McCain: Well, he's switched on
several issues, but this one is remarkable. One he was categorical
in his statement when he opposed that legislation. Then he goes before AIPAC
and supports it. I know he's changing on the surge, he's trying to
change on his pledge to negotiate with dictators without preconditions. ...
The American people will not buy this. ... He doesn't have the
experience or the knowledge to make the judgments that are necessary.
From
the June 4 edition of ABC Radio Networks' The
Mark Levin Show:
LEVIN: I think one of
the things that bothers me the most about Barack Obama is he's a liar.
We've talked about this before -- excuse me -- he lies about his past. He
lies about his relationships. He lies about his true intentions. And he was in
front of the American Israel Political -- or excuse me -- Public Affairs Council [sic], AIPAC, and he lied to
those people and got a standing ovation.
He told
them today that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards should be designated a terrorist
group after voting against a bill designating them a terrorist group a year
ago. And that vote passed
76-22, one of the 22 senators to vote against it was Barack Obama. The
Republicans voted 47-2 for it. Democrats 29-20 for it. Even [Senate Majority
Leader] Harry Reid [D-NV] voted for it. Barack Obama is a radical extremist and
he's a liar.
So to go in front of all these Jews at this organization in Washington and say that the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard should be
legally designated as a terrorist organization when he voted against it a few
months ago is a disgrace. Now, will anyone in the lib media pick up on this?
No, they won't. And not only will I tell you why they won't,
you're going to hear why they won't.
From the June 5 edition of Fox
News' The Live Desk:
MacCALLUM:
All right, well, now
that the general election is indeed upon us we will hear more about the
specific issues and the differences between the two candidates. One they have been far apart on is whether the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard -- and Iran very much a central foreign policy issue to
consider for everybody here -- whether or not the Guard should be considered --
on the world stage -- a terrorist organization. Now that classification brings
with it a lot of connotations. So now, interestingly, for the very first time,
Barack Obama seems to be changing his tune on the significant issue.
So listen to this.
OBAMA
[video clip]: We should work with Europe, Japan, and the Gulf states to find
every avenue outside the United Nations to isolate the Iranian regime, from
cutting off loan guarantees and expanding financial sanctions to banning the
export of refined petroleum to Iran, to boycotting firms associated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, who
Quds Forces have rightly been labeled a terrorist organization.
MacCALLUM: "Rightly been labeled a terrorist organization." Griff Jenkins is a blogger and Fox
News correspondent. He was on that McCain -- John McCain conference call, which
we're going to play for you in just a minute. But, Griff, this was --
this was a moment that made a lot of people sit up and say, "What did he
say?"
JENKINS:
Well, look, Martha, let the general election beatings begin. Here's
what's on the blogs about this. There's several writing about it
today, mostly on the right, and they're saying this is what happens in a
general election when a candidate has been very far to the left in his position
-- or right, but left in this case -- and he has to work his way back to the
center to get more appeal. Jennifer Rubin, as you pointed out on our conference
call yesterday, was whacking away about this with Senator McCain. And now a lot
of people have picked it up today. One blogger actually wrote -- Phil Kline
over at the americanspectator.org -- was writing that Obama has, quote,
"a Mitt Romney problem," meaning that he has to struggle to explain
sort of evolving positions.
MacCALLUM:
Very interesting. And real quick, Griff, he did sort of qualify. He said the Quds Force
of the Revolutionary Guard should be considered a terrorist organization. Is
that a distinction that he's making?
JENKINS:
Well, look, here's what the Obama camp is telling me. They're
telling me, look, this is absolutely not true that he's changed his
position at all. They say they've considered the Iranian National [sic]
Guard a terrorist organization, and put forth their own legislation standing up
to Iran, and, in fact, Martha, if I could call for a statement today I got from Tommy
Vietor from the Obama campaign. Here's what they tell me. That -- well,
let me just give it --
MacCALLUM:
Hang on one second. I think we got it coming. Yeah, here's Tommy
Vietor's --
JENKINS:
There we are.
MacCALLUM:
Go ahead.
JENKINS:
"Barack Obama co-sponsored a bill that would designate the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization, so John McCain's
stubborn repetition of outright falsehoods just adds to his troubling pattern
of making misleading, partisan attacks without knowing the facts." So,
you know, I think it's going to be continued to be debated --
MacCALLUM:
Yeah.
JENKINS
-- with digging and digging and everything that Senator Obama has said about
this.
MacCALLUM:
And no doubt in these town halls and these debates, this is going to be a major
issue that we're going to keep a very close eye on.
Published: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:59:19 GMT - Source: Mediamatters.Org - Read the article
Sign-up to receive daily news on Jennifer Rubin by email. 
